Publications
Partnerships with social economy: an alternative to PPPs?
22 July 2024
This paper examines the potential of Public-Social Partnerships (PSPPs) as an alternative to Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) for delivering public projects in Canada. Although PPSEs are increasingly being adopted by different levels of government, there is still little research on their ability to overcome the limitations of PPPs in terms of participation and social responsibility.
Research axis : Democratic management
Un breve esquema de tres modelos de planificación democrática
Research axis : Engaged Pedagogies and Practice of Research
1 recherche
Five Criteria to Evaluate Democratic Economic Planning Models
Research axis : Emancipation
1 recherche
Democratic Economic Planning, Social Metabolism and the Environment
Research axis : Emancipation
1 recherche
Using the Market Basket Measure to Discuss Income Inequality from the Perspective of Basic Needs
Research axis : Emancipation
1 recherche
Emancipatory Social Innovation: Neo-Polanyian Theoretical Foundations (CJNSER / ReCROES paper)
Research axis : Emancipation
Exploring Carceral Food Systems as Sites of Contestation and Possibility in Canadian Federal Prisons: The Food Services Modernization Initiative
Research axis : Social Action
Les « besoins »: une notion à redéfinir?
4 March 2022
The notion of “needs” appears in a multitude of scientific fields, but there is little review of the literature on the subject from an interdisciplinary perspective. We propose to distinguish two main approaches to this notion: the first recognizes the existence of “absolute” or “objective” needs, while the second groups together perspectives that can be described as “relativistic”. Finally, we conclude with some thoughts on how to think about the articulation of needs and democratic processes.
Research axis : Emancipation
1 recherche
A brief sketch of three models of democratic economic planning
Between 1988 and 1993 three models of democratic economic planning were designed by Pat Devine (joined later by Fikret Adaman), Michael Albert & Robin Hahnel and Paul Cockshott & Allin Cottrell. These three models are called negotiated coordination, participatory economics and computerized central planning. They are still at the center of the discussion about what a postcapitalist economy should look like.
Research axis : Emancipation
1 recherche
N’étions-nous pas des enseignant·e·s? Décentrer notre pratique universitaire de la recherche
4 February 2021
Under the cobblestones, the university: engaging collective innovation to rethink our practices
22 October 2020
Un projet de planification économique pour le Québec
Cette recherche détaille comment le Québec pourrait effectuer des réformes importantes suite à cette crise pour se diriger vers un changement de système économique.
Research axis : Emancipation
1 recherche
The Ecological Economics of Economic Democracy
Ecological economics is at a sharp crossroads today, mostly due to the unprecedented scale of the intertwined social and ecological crises we face. We argue that the discipline should engage with the thinking and practices around alternatives to capitalism more substantially, as this is essential and invaluable for the discipline’s ability to contribute to a just and sustainable future.
Research axis : Emancipation
1 recherche
Economies as Commons: Labor and Production in Solidarity
This chapter is motivated by this observation; namely, that putting the literatures on the commons and solidarity economies in a critical dialogue is not only needed and timely, but would also be politically productive.
Research axis : Emancipation
1 recherche
Emancipatory social innovation: neopolanyian theoretical foundations
This CRITS Research Note aims to theorize and disseminate some of the tacit knowledge of social innovation practitioners focusing on systemic transitions. By mobilizing Nancy Fraser’s Neopolanyian Critical Theory, we are developing the Emancipatory Social Innovation (ESI) school of thought in order to respond to the specific problem of the current mismatch between the theories and practices of transsystemic social innovations.
Research axis : Emancipation
Le déficit humain imposé aux plus pauvres
Dans cette note, l’Institut de recherche et d’informations socioéconomiques (IRIS) souhaite lever un coin du voile sur cette dette collective envers les plus pauvres en mesurant un aspect de ces déficits humains, soit les dollars ayant manqué aux revenus des ménages du Québec, de 2002 à 2011, pour combler leurs besoins de base. Nous démontrons que, malgré l’ampleur de la richesse produite collectivement, nous imposons d’importants sacrifices à une part non négligeable de la population en raison de son maintien sous le seuil de cette couverture minimale.
De la décroissance à la planification démocratique : un programme de recherche
En gros, mon objectif est de tracer ici un programme de recherche qui – s’il intéresse – pourrait réunir une diversité de personnes dans un effort commun. Je commencerai par définir ce que je crois être la question centrale, soit la planification démocratique, pour ensuite aborder ce programme dans les principales sous-questions qu’il soulève.
Research axis : Emancipation
1 recherche
Contribution à une économie politique de l’émancipation
Cette Contribution à une économie politique de l’émancipation a pour objet d’étude les institutions de trois projets émancipateurs : le projet d’autonomie de Cornélius Castoriadis, le municipalisme libertaire de Murray Bookchin et l’économie participative de Michael Albert et Robin Hahnel. La thèse formule la critique de ces projets à partir de quatre théories critiques contemporaines : la démocratie radicale française (Jacques Rancière, Claude Lefort, Miguel Abensour), l’école de la limite (André Gorz, John Bellamy Foster, Serge Latouche), la critique de la valeur (Moishe Postone, Robert Kurz, Anselme Jappe) et les pratiques des organisations libertaires (Francesca Polletta, Francis Dupuis-Déri, David Graeber).